{"id":3834,"date":"2008-08-19T00:32:31","date_gmt":"2008-08-19T00:32:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tomfarandasfolly.com\/?p=3834"},"modified":"2025-09-30T01:06:00","modified_gmt":"2025-09-30T01:06:00","slug":"more-on-the-saddlebrook-church-values-forum-about-mccain-and-obamas-answers-to-a-question-about-supreme-court-justices","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tomfarandasfolly.com\/?p=3834","title":{"rendered":"More on the Saddlebrook Church &#8220;Values Forum&#8221; about McCain and Obama&#8217;s answers to a question about Supreme Court justices"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I posted about the Forum earlier here <a href=\"http:\/\/tomfaranda.typepad.com\/folly\/2008\/08\/interesting-column-on-this-past-weekends-values-forum-with-mccain-and-obama-interviewed-by-evangelical-pastor-rick-warren.html\"><font color=\"#800080\">Tom Faranda&#39;s Folly: Interesting column on this past weekend Saddlebrook Church &quot;Values Forum&quot; with McCain and Obama question&#8230;<\/font><\/a>&#160;but&#160;I didn&#39;t&#160;watch it myself.<\/p>\n<p>The <strong>Wall Street Journal<\/strong> had an editorial yesterday, about Obama&#39;s dissing and slighting of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. There are seven paragraphs; and it&#39;s worth hitting the link to read the whole thing. With the WSJ you sometimes have to hit the link three or four times before you get through.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB121901817146948231.html\"><font color=\"#800080\"><strong>Obama on Clarence Thomas &#8211; WSJ.com<\/strong><\/font><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote dir=\"ltr\" style=\"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px\">\n<p class=\"times\">Pastor Rick Warren asked each Presidential candidate which Justices he would <em>not<\/em> have nominated. Mr. McCain said, &quot;with all due respect&quot; the four most liberal sitting Justices because of his different judicial philosophy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"times\">Mr. Obama took a lower road, replying first that &quot;that&#39;s a good one,&quot; and then adding that &quot;I would not have nominated Clarence Thomas. I don&#39;t think that he, I don&#39;t think that he was a strong enough jurist or legal thinker at the time for that elevation. Setting aside the fact that I profoundly disagree with his interpretation of a lot of the Constitution.&quot; The Democrat added that he also wouldn&#39;t have appointed Antonin Scalia, and perhaps not John Roberts, though he assured the audience that at least <em>they<\/em> were smart enough for the job.<\/p>\n<p class=\"times\">&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<\/p>\n<p class=\"times\">Even more troubling is what the Illinois Democrat&#39;s answer betrays about his political habits of mind. Asked a question he didn&#39;t expect at a rare unscripted event, the rookie candidate didn&#39;t merely say he disagreed with Justice Thomas. Instead, he instinctively reverted to the leftwing clich\u00e9 that the Court&#39;s black conservative isn&#39;t up to the job while his white conservative colleagues are.<\/p>\n<p class=\"times\">So much for civility in politics and bringing people together. And no wonder Mr. Obama&#39;s advisers have refused invitations for more such open forums, preferring to keep him in front of a teleprompter, where he won&#39;t let slip what he really believes.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p class=\"times\">&#160;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I posted about the Forum earlier here Tom Faranda&#39;s Folly: Interesting column on this past weekend Saddlebrook Church &quot;Values Forum&quot; with McCain and Obama question&#8230;&#160;but&#160;I didn&#39;t&#160;watch it myself. The Wall Street Journal had an editorial yesterday, about Obama&#39;s dissing and slighting of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. There are seven paragraphs; and it&#39;s worth hitting [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3834","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tomfarandasfolly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3834","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tomfarandasfolly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tomfarandasfolly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tomfarandasfolly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tomfarandasfolly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3834"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/tomfarandasfolly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3834\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9245,"href":"https:\/\/tomfarandasfolly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3834\/revisions\/9245"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tomfarandasfolly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3834"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tomfarandasfolly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3834"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tomfarandasfolly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3834"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}