The day he dies, the NY Times explains Billy Graham’s “missed opportunities”

Billy graham

The man's body is still warm but the NYT has to give an opinion on his failings. The author is an emeritus professor at the University of California, Berkley. No doubt this column has been ready to go for a while. Says more about the NY Times than about Billy Graham.

Billy Graham’s Missed Opportunities

Mr. Graham led his followers to seek comfort in versions of Christianity familiar to his core constituency, the white population of the Southern, formerly slave-holding region of the United States. He offered only weak challenges to the prejudices and injustices largely tolerated by that population.

************

Mr. Graham had a choice as to where he would urge his followers to come down on these issues. Consistently, he distanced himself from the efforts of ecumenists to revise Christianity in cosmopolitan directions. He encouraged his vast and devoted following to believe that God’s word was unchanging and that liberals were substituting their own ideas for those of a supernatural, unchanging deity revealed in the Bible. He dumbed down his inherited faith instead of helping it to address the challenges of modern times.

The memory of Mr. Graham is rightly honored by those who shared his values and the goals for which he mobilized evangelical Christianity. But the rest of us can surely be forgiven if we remember him differently.

More drivel if you hit the link above.


Comments

3 responses to “The day he dies, the NY Times explains Billy Graham’s “missed opportunities””

  1. I couldn’t even finish it. While I personally am not a fan of evangelists, tele–or-otherwise, Graham led a remarkable life free of scandal and punctuated with genuine sincerity. He is to be admired not second-guessed in death.

  2. Judy Anderson Avatar
    Judy Anderson

    We should applaud preacher Graham’s goodness and life’s work and celebrate that he did not seek to “revise Christianity in cosmopolitan directions.” There is a big difference between living the dictates of one’s faith, as he did consistently if imperfectly like most of us, and trying to reinvent faith for the satisfaction of one’s ego. The best of ecumenism is difficult because it seeks to discover the fullness of truth and that involves us all.

  3. Well said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *